For me, I think the academic and corporate community
is missing the point. When I see the ‘Innovating
Innovation’ logo and read a-another essay about innovating innovation, I’ve
not yet seen one on ‘Innovating Innovation.’ What I always see are essays that
reinforce the authors current or old paradigm. But I have not one yet seen an
essay on ‘Innovation Innovation.’
So here a framework for such essay(s):
Innovating Innovation is – for me – about the transcendental
concept of innovating innovation. That is, innovation as a subject about
itself.
Not another subject about how to innovate in new ways or
processes; or even context like radical innovation, or game changing
innovation, or scrumdiddilyumpshus innovation.
No, ‘innovating
innovation’ for me is about the limits of the contextual framework for
innovation. As in how far and how many kind of innovation paradigms are there
or could possibly be?
Take the concept of ‘The-design-space-of-possibilities.’ How many possibilities are there
for design in the universe until the universe’s heat death trillions-upon- trillion
of year from now?
According to Claude Shannon’s Information Theory there
is not enough time in the universe to explore all the meaningful possibilities
of innovating innovation.
So my hope and point is: when are we going to see an
essay/paper/article on the ‘Innovating
Innovation’ in this transcendental context?
No comments:
Post a Comment